#8300 closed patch (wontfix)
Disable unaligned accesses on Alpha
| Reported by: | SF/mellum | Owned by: | fingolfin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | Ports |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Game: |
Description
On Alpha, unaligned accesses don't crash, but are incredibly expensive.
Ticket imported from: #847463. Ticket imported from: patches/405.
Attachments (1)
Change History (8)
by , 17 years ago
| Attachment: | alpha-unaligned.patch added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
comment:2 by , 17 years ago
| Status: | new → pending |
|---|
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
| Status: | pending → new |
|---|
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
The point is to avoid slowdowns of a factor of 100 and spamming the syslog file with warnings. For this, the patch shortcuts the test which tries to check whether one can get away with unaligned accesses.
The proper method would IMHO be to have a list of architectures which are known not to have any problems with unaligned accesses, but that was turned down when I suggested it.
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
| Owner: | set to |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
A hardcoded list of architectures hardly ever is a "proper way". It means that you get troubles whenever somebody tries to get stuff working on an so far untested system. The reason that autoconf is so successful and flexible is that it checks for features, not for operating systems/processors/.... I very much strongly disagree with your statement that "a list of architectures" is the "proper method" to handle this. It most definitely is *not* the proper way, isiolated.
However, *augmenting* an automatic detection by a few hard coded cases is an option. However that shouldn't be implemented by relying on some preprocessor flag in the C check, rather the script should check the uname value to detect the Alpha architecture.
comment:7 by , 2 years ago
| Component: | → Ports |
|---|
So what exactly is the point of this patch? What does it do, and why do you think it should be added to ScummVM?